Toronto Fishing Forum

今年的5月4号（6am- 1pm)在 哈密尔顿北边Binbrook有一年一次的画册比赛，我看大家可以组织一下一起去参加，以前的费用是20块一个人，还包括中午的BBQ. 重点是那里的画册几乎都是白画册，而且前几年的尺寸都不错，我去那年几乎每条都在10寸以上。但去年就不好，很多幼尺，但数量还是刚刚滴！值得注意的是那里只有画册可以拿，其他鱼都要C&R, 希望大家遵守规矩。

有听k君讲起你的光辉事迹
大腿没抱上去年

去年我没和K君去过，不过今年应该会去，已经约好了。

cure-hb 写道:去年我没和K君去过，不过今年应该会去，已经约好了。

。。。。。。这么早就约了
你们。。。。

cure-hb 写道:今年的5月4号（6am- 1pm)在 哈密尔顿北边Binbrook有一年一次的画册比赛，我看大家可以组织一下一起去参加，以前的费用是20块一个人，还包括中午的BBQ. 重点是那里的画册几乎都是白画册，而且前几年的尺寸都不错，我去那年几乎每条都在10寸以上。但去年就不好，很多幼尺，但数量还是刚刚滴！值得注意的是那里只有画册可以拿，其他鱼都要C&R, 希望大家遵守规矩。

是岸钓还是船钓？ 哪里可以报名呀？

去年韩兄弟两次call我去钓花册，不巧都在Hastings大战碧古，很是遗憾。这次一定不会错过。
而且论坛里众兄弟一起比赛，争取名次，论坛也有光彩。
能去的都去哈。

那里会不会污染比较严重？

不需要报名，到了交入场费就可以了，船钓岸钓都可以，等你钓到大鱼之后可以去称重，但要活的！早上6点开始，建议大家早点到，不然排队入场要很久。

那儿的鱼别吃吖，有名的污染区。

上次和阿迪冰钓时，和当地的老外聊起污染的事，他们说没问题了。前年时政府曾经在湖边插牌警告不要食用那里的鱼。既然现在没有警示，应该就是通过检测没危险了。按GUIDE食用就好了。

那里的CRAPPIE有点泛滥成灾，不知道是不是大家都觉得不安全的原因。我曾经在夏天的中午去钓了一个小时，轻轻松松钓满。

白雪丹枫 写道:上次和阿迪冰钓时，和当地的老外聊起污染的事，他们说没问题了。前年时政府曾经在湖边插牌警告不要食用那里的鱼。既然现在没有警示，应该就是通过检测没危险了。按GUIDE食用就好了。

那里的CRAPPIE有点泛滥成灾，不知道是不是大家都觉得不安全的原因。我曾经在夏天的中午去钓了一个小时，轻轻松松钓满。

可以查看一下那里的水的源头在哪里。

XUYCA 写道:

白雪丹枫 写道:上次和阿迪冰钓时，和当地的老外聊起污染的事，他们说没问题了。前年时政府曾经在湖边插牌警告不要食用那里的鱼。既然现在没有警示，应该就是通过检测没危险了。按GUIDE食用就好了。

那里的CRAPPIE有点泛滥成灾，不知道是不是大家都觉得不安全的原因。我曾经在夏天的中午去钓了一个小时，轻轻松松钓满。

可以查看一下那里的水的源头在哪里。

大前年污染是因为机场用除草剂，雨水把除草剂冲到湖里了，和水源头没什么关系。

风雨 写道:那儿的鱼别吃吖，有名的污染区。

既然都说有污染，我就上网上查了一下，不查不知道，一查吓一跳，还真的是这样，有官方的报道！
http://www.thespec.com/news-story/21794 ... oir-fish-/

白雪丹枫 写道:

XUYCA 写道:

白雪丹枫 写道:上次和阿迪冰钓时，和当地的老外聊起污染的事，他们说没问题了。前年时政府曾经在湖边插牌警告不要食用那里的鱼。既然现在没有警示，应该就是通过检测没危险了。按GUIDE食用就好了。
那里的CRAPPIE有点泛滥成灾，不知道是不是大家都觉得不安全的原因。我曾经在夏天的中午去钓了一个小时，轻轻松松钓满。

可以查看一下那里的水的源头在哪里。

大前年污染是因为机场用除草剂，雨水把除草剂冲到湖里了，和水源头没什么关系。

Don’t eat Binbrook Reservoir fish
For years, Binbrook Conservation Area’s reservoir Lake Niapenco was thought to be relatively free of pollution.

It’s not.

The popular five-kilometre-long reservoir and Welland River tributary feeding it are contaminated with a toxic chemical restricted in Canada since 2004 to such unsafe levels that the province now warns children and child-bearing aged women not to eat any fish at all from the reservoir, and others to eat no more than two meals a month. Furthermore, only smaller fish should be consumed because the larger the fish, the higher the concentration of the pollutant.

Those fish consumption restrictions exist for only three other water courses in Ontario – one of them the creek that flows into Lake Niapenco, formally known as Binbrook Reservoir.

The synthetic chemical, called perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) or perfluorooctane sulfonate, is the key component in the suppression foam airport fire crews use to fight aviation fires. It also used to be the main ingredient in Scotchgard, 3M’s stain repeller used in everything from clothes to carpets until 3M began stopped using it in the formula in 2000.

“I’m totally devastated by this,” said Andy Fevez, 70, a member of the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority board of directors and a leading member of the Glanbrook Conservation Committee, a volunteer group dedicated to improving the park.

“We’re in there planting vegetation and keeping out the invasive plants at one end, and at the other end, this stuff is coming in unbeknownst to us. It just breaks my heart having worked on this conservation area for the past 25 years.”

Not a lot is known about the health effects of PFOS on humans. Unlike other chemicals that accumulate in fat tissues, PFOS builds up in the blood, liver and gall bladder. Animal studies have shown organ damage from high concentrations, but few long-term human studies have been done.

The big concern about PFOS is that it is “a biocumulative bioconcentrator,” said Don McLean, a well-known Hamilton environmental advocate. Smaller fish get eaten by bigger fish, and so on, concentrating the chemical the higher up the food chain one goes.

“The highest concentrations in North America generally are found in birds like eagles,” he said.

The discovery of the Lake Niapenco contamination was purely accidental and totally unexpected.

In 2009, Environment Canada scientists began an organic toxins accumulation study in Hamilton Harbour and the Humber River in Toronto, and they picked Lake Niapenco as the study’s reference or “control” site, believing the rural lake was not impacted by industrial or municipal sewage discharge. The last thing they expected to find was high concentrations of PFOS in reservoir turtle blood.

That set off a chain of events. The feds told the province, who went in and began their own fish testing. Sure enough, the lake’s large and smallmouth bass, pike, carp, crappie, bullheads and catfish were all contaminated. It meant Guide to Eating Ontario Sport Fish, which came out this month, had to be changed to reflect new restrictions on consumption. Ontario’s Ministry of Environment (MoE) notified the conservation authority in December.

The big question is: Where is it coming from?

In three weeks, the MoE kicks off a large-scale hunt for the source of the PFOS called a track-back, and to figure out what remedial action may need to be taken.

“We are sending a team to do all the tributaries of the upper Welland River,” to test the creek waters and sedimets for PFOS, said senior MoE spokesperson Jennifer Hall. “It’s a major study (in which) we follow the trail. If we find a path for it, we keep going until identify the source of the path.”

Depending on what the chemical sleuths find, the question may become: Where did it come from in the past?

A leading suspect is John C. Munro Hamilton International Airport, which sits on the headwaters of the Welland River. Fire crews used to train at the airport with the PFOS-laden fire suppression foam.

“We have it in our trucks, but we don’t train on site, we haven’t done so in about a decade,” said Richard Koroscil, president and CEO of the airport. Specialized airport firefighting training is now done at a facility at Toronto’s Pearson International Airport.

Another suspect is the old Mount Hope dump at the corner of White Church Road and Highway 6 South. “It’s possible something in there is leaking out,” Fevez said.

The fishing season on the reservoir is currently closed, but set to open May 1. The reservoir is mandatory catch-and-release for bass and pike, but not for the other fish species. Conservation officials say they devising an extensive notification and information campaign for anglers.

“We will post signage around the lake and hand out fact sheets at our gate,” said Darcy Baker, NPCA director of land management. Because anglers with Asian backgrounds like to use the reservoir to catch carp, which they consider a delicacy, the conservation authority will also post the information in Mandarin and Cantonese.

The NPCA was supposed to discuss the problem at its March board meeting, which was cancelled due to an intense snowstorm. The next public board meeting is April 20.

pmorse@thespec.com

905-526-3434

刚刚查了一下有关资料，想说至少白画册是相对安全和可以食用的。
第一，正如白雪所说的，污染严重的时候是大前年，而且湿鼻摘录的文章是2011年4月发表的，证明了这一点。
第二，每年老外的钓画册比赛一直在搞，而且绝大多数人并没有扔掉渔获。
第三，以下摘录的是2013-2014年 Ministry of the Environment's Guide to Eating Ontario Sport Fish, 图上数字
表明该地8寸至14寸的白画册每月可以吃四次，育龄妇女和儿童也可以吃同样的量。

最后，向韩兄弟致敬！论坛需要这样无私奉献钓鱼资源和信息的人。
Guide链接：
https://dr6j45jk9xcmk.cloudfront.net/do ... fishen.pdf

白雪丹枫 写道:上次和阿迪冰钓时，和当地的老外聊起污染的事，他们说没问题了。前年时政府曾经在湖边插牌警告不要食用那里的鱼。既然现在没有警示，应该就是通过检测没危险了。按GUIDE食用就好了。

那里的CRAPPIE有点泛滥成灾，不知道是不是大家都觉得不安全的原因。我曾经在夏天的中午去钓了一个小时，轻轻松松钓满。

去过俩次，感觉尺寸偏小，介两年就没去。

对了，介个地方可以用的船马达似乎有尺寸限制？

画册？

边走边钓 写道:呵呵，黄兄是百事通啊！啥都知道啊，那天黄兄和当地西人说英文，一点口音都没有，呱唧呱唧聊了半天，原来探听了这么多情报啊！佩服佩服啊！

白雪丹枫 写道:

XUYCA 写道:

白雪丹枫 写道:上次和阿迪冰钓时，和当地的老外聊起污染的事，他们说没问题了。前年时政府曾经在湖边插牌警告不要食用那里的鱼。既然现在没有警示，应该就是通过检测没危险了。按GUIDE食用就好了。

那里的CRAPPIE有点泛滥成灾，不知道是不是大家都觉得不安全的原因。我曾经在夏天的中午去钓了一个小时，轻轻松松钓满。

可以查看一下那里的水的源头在哪里。

大前年污染是因为机场用除草剂，雨水把除草剂冲到湖里了，和水源头没什么关系。

阿迪又来笑话我了！ 我是刚好知道有这回事，因为这是上过报纸的。

我所知道的污染不是前年，也就是11年，而是更早；当时也草草查了一些资料，某些化学名字不懂，反正是某种很难降解的致癌物啥的。

那里的画册当地人是很少吃的。大家最好也少吃。

那是个保护区，靠门票收入维持大概；所以当地政府的一些消息，大家自己有所鉴别为好。。。我自己是宁可去simcoe甚至更北的地方搞画册。

另外，那个小湖的画册曾经被我们华人朋友们扫荡光过，老钓友们都知道。现在可能有所恢复了；所以也不要期望成绩有多好。

求具体位置在哪里啊。不能吃去过过瘾也好。谢过谢过

xinguang 写道:求具体位置在哪里啊。不能吃去过过瘾也好。谢过谢过

找到位置了吗？GOOGLE 一下“binbrook conservation area" 试试。