Brushless...Yes
Power...820 UWO, top of the line
SideHandle...360*
Battery...2x5.0ah





Sergeantpepper @ 周三 9月 26, 2018 3:37 pm 写道: https://www.amazon.ca/DEWALT-DCD991P2-Lithium-Brushless-3-Speed/dp/B01DR90LY0/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1537925362&sr=8-4&keywords=dewalt+dcd996p2&dpID=51eUZ03DONL&preST=_SY300_QL70_&dpSrc=srch
Brushless...Yes
Power...820 UWO, top of the line
SideHandle...360*


Sergeantpepper @ 周三 9月 26, 2018 3:37 pm 写道: https://www.amazon.ca/DEWALT-DCD991P2-Lithium-Brushless-3-Speed/dp/B01DR90LY0/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1537925362&sr=8-4&keywords=dewalt+dcd996p2&dpID=51eUZ03DONL&preST=_SY300_QL70_&dpSrc=srch
Brushless...Yes
Power...820 UWO, top of the line
SideHandle...360*


jimi.cui @ Wed Sep 26, 2018 3:44 pm 写道:Sergeantpepper @ 周三 9月 26, 2018 3:37 pm 写道: https://www.amazon.ca/DEWALT-DCD991P2-Lithium-Brushless-3-Speed/dp/B01DR90LY0/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1537925362&sr=8-4&keywords=dewalt+dcd996p2&dpID=51eUZ03DONL&preST=_SY300_QL70_&dpSrc=srch
Brushless...Yes
Power...820 UWO, top of the line
SideHandle...360*
型号是不是应该是995或996才对啊

Sergeantpepper @ 周三 9月 26, 2018 3:52 pm 写道:jimi.cui @ Wed Sep 26, 2018 3:44 pm 写道:Sergeantpepper @ 周三 9月 26, 2018 3:37 pm 写道: https://www.amazon.ca/DEWALT-DCD991P2-Lithium-Brushless-3-Speed/dp/B01DR90LY0/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1537925362&sr=8-4&keywords=dewalt+dcd996p2&dpID=51eUZ03DONL&preST=_SY300_QL70_&dpSrc=srch
Brushless...Yes
Power...820 UWO, top of the line
SideHandle...360*
型号是不是应该是995或996才对啊
991...Drill+Driver
996...Drill+Driver+Hammer
same power


xiaolu @ Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:37 pm 写道: 这个牌子叫"低瓦特". 我一直没看女子. 主要是赶脚她的功率 UNIT OF POWER (也就是瓦特), 太低. 此乃"低瓦特"也.
)
Sergeantpepper @ 周三 9月 26, 2018 4:52 pm 写道:xiaolu @ Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:37 pm 写道: 这个牌子叫"低瓦特". 我一直没看女子. 主要是赶脚她的功率 UNIT OF POWER (也就是瓦特), 太低. 此乃"低瓦特"也.
![]()
疯蛙和边卩也會用这个 (dont ask how do I know)
Dewalt 用UWO(Unit Watts Out) 标榜power, 其他杂牌则用torque,
Power = torque x RPM , 固定的power, RPM 越高, 可輸出的Torque 则越低
用Power标榜較实在, 标榜torque的实应註明會在那个RPM發生
820UWO = 820/746 = 1hp+

Sergeantpepper @ 周三 9月 26, 2018 4:52 pm 写道:xiaolu @ Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:37 pm 写道: 这个牌子叫"低瓦特". 我一直没看女子. 主要是赶脚她的功率 UNIT OF POWER (也就是瓦特), 太低. 此乃"低瓦特"也.
![]()
疯蛙和边卩也會用这个 (dont ask how do I know)
Dewalt 用UWO(Unit Watts Out) 标榜power, 其他杂牌则用torque,
Power = torque x RPM , 固定的power, RPM 越高, 可輸出的Torque 则越低
用Power标榜較实在, 标榜torque的实应註明會在那个RPM發生
820UWO = 820/746 = 1hp+

potato @ 周四 9月 27, 2018 10:06 am 写道:Sergeantpepper @ 周三 9月 26, 2018 4:52 pm 写道:xiaolu @ Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:37 pm 写道: 这个牌子叫"低瓦特". 我一直没看女子. 主要是赶脚她的功率 UNIT OF POWER (也就是瓦特), 太低. 此乃"低瓦特"也.
![]()
疯蛙和边卩也會用这个 (dont ask how do I know)
Dewalt 用UWO(Unit Watts Out) 标榜power, 其他杂牌则用torque,
Power = torque x RPM , 固定的power, RPM 越高, 可輸出的Torque 则越低
用Power标榜較实在, 标榜torque的实应註明會在那个RPM發生
820UWO = 820/746 = 1hp+
学习了,那就是说我的眼光没错![]()
俺也用低瓦


jimi.cui @ 周四 9月 27, 2018 10:17 am 写道:potato @ 周四 9月 27, 2018 10:06 am 写道:Sergeantpepper @ 周三 9月 26, 2018 4:52 pm 写道:
![]()
疯蛙和边卩也會用这个 (dont ask how do I know)
Dewalt 用UWO(Unit Watts Out) 标榜power, 其他杂牌则用torque,
Power = torque x RPM , 固定的power, RPM 越高, 可輸出的Torque 则越低
用Power标榜較实在, 标榜torque的实应註明會在那个RPM發生
820UWO = 820/746 = 1hp+
学习了,那就是说我的眼光没错![]()
俺也用低瓦
我认为有三个牌子是可以信得过的:低瓦/博士/米瓦气
低瓦/博士做home DIY都挺好用的;我不在冰上打洞,没用过蜜娃妻 

Sergeantpepper @ Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:52 pm 写道:xiaolu @ Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:37 pm 写道: 这个牌子叫"低瓦特". 我一直没看女子. 主要是赶脚她的功率 UNIT OF POWER (也就是瓦特), 太低. 此乃"低瓦特"也.
![]()
疯蛙和边卩也會用这个 (dont ask how do I know)
Dewalt 用UWO(Unit Watts Out) 标榜power, 其他杂牌则用torque,
Power = torque x RPM , 固定的power, RPM 越高, 可輸出的Torque 则越低
用Power标榜較实在, 标榜torque的实应註明會在那个RPM發生
820UWO = 820/746 = 1hp+

Sergeantpepper @ 周五 9月 28, 2018 11:24 am 写道: 绝对可以算出来
其他标榜 max.torque 的应該跟你說一样要說明max.torque 會在那个RPM存在
一般有效率的冰钻其auger工作RPM应高于60, 每秒一转太慢了, 我用手钻也不止此


Sergeantpepper @ 周五 9月 28, 2018 11:24 am 写道: 绝对可以算出来
其他标榜 max.torque 的应該跟你說一样要說明max.torque 會在那个RPM存在
一般有效率的冰钻其auger工作RPM应高于60, 每秒一转太慢了, 我用手钻也不止此


Sergeantpepper @ Fri Sep 28, 2018 11:24 am 写道: 绝对可以算出来
其他标榜 max.torque 的应該跟你說一样要說明max.torque 會在那个RPM存在
一般有效率的冰钻其auger工作RPM应高于60, 每秒一转太慢了, 我用手钻也不止此

Sergeantpepper @ Fri Sep 28, 2018 1:23 pm 写道: 1h.p. output torque at 60 RPM appr.= 1,050 lb-in (see below chart)
事实上torque 的单位应該是lb-in 不是in-lb, 后者应是Work Done 单位 (見中学物理)
DeWalt DCD 991, 996的 UWO 皆是820, 其Output torque at 60RPM Appr.=1154lb-in
不知Milwaukee 2704 的1200 lb-in 是指那个RMP
Gear train 与 output torque 在計算上无关, 複杂的gear train 會增加frictional loss 降低output 则是事实
http://www.wentec.com/unipower/calculators/power_torque.asp



Sergeantpepper @ Fri Sep 28, 2018 3:33 pm 写道:![]()
![]()
Do you fish alot in New York? just curious
you got me...so fishingbrooklin = fishingscugog 




xiaolu @ Fri Sep 28, 2018 3:52 pm 写道:Sergeantpepper @ Fri Sep 28, 2018 3:33 pm 写道:![]()
![]()
Do you fish alot in New York? just curious
Ha! You mean he fish a lot in Brooklyn (of New York City)? Or is he from Brooklin (of Whitby which is just east of Scarborough/Toronto)?:-)
